← All briefings

Investment decisions

High-Net-Worth Investment Strategy: Compare the Whole Mandate

Edited by Amr Atef · Founder and editorial coordinatorPublished: Updated:

Decision in brief

Two proposals with the same return target can ask the family to accept very different risks. Compare the complete mandate: what can be bought, how leverage is used, how fees are charged, where the assets are held and when capital can be returned.

Put every proposal on the same basis

Mandate comparison
DimensionQuestion for the proposer
ReturnIs the figure a target, history or contractual payment?
FeesWhich management, performance and underlying charges apply?
RiskWhat happens to capital in an adverse scenario?
LiquidityWhat is the actual redemption or exit mechanism?
OwnershipWhich legal person holds the asset and receives distributions?
CurrencyWhat does the outcome mean in the family’s spending currency?

Correctly measure currency

Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast: if one euro initially buys one dollar, €100 buys $100. A 9% USD return produces $109. If the euro then falls 12% to $0.88, that becomes about €123.86 before fees and tax, a gain in euro terms. The earlier article incorrectly called this a loss.

Inspect private-market terms

The SEC notes that private-equity fund documents govern terms including fees and expenses, and that investment can remain illiquid for years. Obtain those documents before comparing the proposal with liquid public assets.

Source:[1] SEC / Investor.gov

  • Ask who values assets, how often, and what evidence supports the valuation.
  • Separate a manager’s own history from an illustrative strategy backtest.
  • Identify investor eligibility, concentration and commitments already made.
  • Request a clear statement of conflicts and compensation.

When to decline or delay

If the provider cannot explain how an advertised return is calculated, or the proposal requires access to money the family cannot lock up, the brief is incomplete. Ask an appropriately qualified investment adviser to review suitability. We can discuss an introduction, with any professional service scope and fees agreed directly with the specialist.

Sources and scope

Editorial briefing checked against the linked sources. No independent professional review is claimed. Application to your circumstances requires a qualified specialist.

  1. Private equity funds

    SEC / Investor.gov · Source checked:

How we work and editorial approach

Define the next professional step

Share the objective, countries and timing. We review the request and discuss the specialist needed and whether an introduction is available. Agree the service scope and fees directly with the specialist.

Continue this topic